Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown Archetype | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Temur Otters | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Domain Zur Overlords | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Domain Zur Overlords | eresopacaso | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Beanstalk , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Midrange , Domain Overlords , Domain Zur Overlords , Golgari Beanstalk , Golgari Demons , Golgari Lifedrain Combo , Golgari Midrange , Gruul Beanstalk
Meta Performance Analysis
Analyze the Pollen ranks #65 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 16%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Green average: 65.6%
Performance compared to other Green cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Analyze the Pollen is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 3
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 35.61 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 76.0%. Analyze the Pollen has a win rate of 72.9%, making it 4.1% worse than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roxanne, Starfall Savant | Legendary Creature — Cat Druid | 9 | 79.4% | 6 |
| Boon-Bringer Valkyrie | Creature — Angel Warrior | 5 | 78.6% | 2 |
| Disfigure | Instant | 8 | 77.6% | 2 |
| Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 10 | 77.1% | 3 |
| Picklock Prankster | Creature — Faerie Rogue // Instant — Adventure | 16 | 75.9% | 7 |
| High Noon | Enchantment | 5 | 75.5% | 2 |
| Season of Gathering | Sorcery | 5 | 74.4% | 2 |
| Bonny Pall, Clearcutter | Legendary Creature — Giant Scout | 6 | 71.8% | 3 |
| Unholy Annex/Ritual Chamber | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 11 | 71.6% | 3 |
| Riptide Gearhulk | Artifact Creature — Construct | 8 | 70.8% | 6 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Analyze the Pollen than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 1 | 8 | 83.3% | 74.2% | +9.2% |
| Overlord of the Mistmoors | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 7 | 31 | 73.2% | 70.6% | +2.6% |
| Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 2 | 30 | 74.1% | 71.8% | +2.3% |
| Get Lost | Instant | 2 | 31 | 75.0% | 73.1% | +1.9% |
| Leyline Binding | Enchantment | 6 | 32 | 74.2% | 72.8% | +1.4% |
| Zur, Eternal Schemer | Legendary Creature — Human Wizard | 3 | 31 | 73.2% | 71.9% | +1.2% |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 11 | 75.6% | 74.4% | +1.2% |
| Ride's End | Instant | 5 | 30 | 73.2% | 72.0% | +1.2% |
| Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 3 | 31 | 73.8% | 72.7% | +1.1% |
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 4 | 29 | 73.9% | 73.1% | +0.8% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Zur Overlords | 937 | 71.4% | 49.2% |
| Temur Otters | 311 | 92.6% | 42.2% |
| Simic Terror | 294 | 95.8% | 44.1% |
| Golgari Midrange | 23 | 3.0% | 65.3% |
| Unknown Archetype | 12 | 3.3% | 61.7% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.